Skip to main content

The Subjective Nature of Nephite Identity


Now this was the covenant which they made, and they cast their garments at the feet of Moroni, saying: We covenant with our God, that we shall be destroyed, even as our brethren in the land northward, if we shall fall into transgression; yea, he may cast us at the feet of our enemies, even as we have cast our garments at thy feet to be trodden under foot, if we shall fall into transgression.

 Moroni said unto them: Behold, we are a remnant of the seed of Jacob; yea, we are a remnant of the seed of Joseph, whose coat was rent by his brethren into many pieces; yea, and now behold, let us remember to keep the commandments of God, or our garments shall be rent by our brethren, and we be cast into prison, or be sold, or be slain.

What's interesting in these verses is that the Nephites identified with their extinct "brethren in the land northward". Captain Moroni, Moron-ite(?), correctivly reminds them of their Israelite heritage and that because of God's promises to that people, they don't have to suffer the same fate of the Jaredites.

This small exchange between Captain Moroni and his warriors, makes alot more sense with the people of Zarahemla, the biggest subset of Nephites, being a Jaredite-ish people.

In my latest posts, I've made arguments for the mixed heritage of the Nephites as being Lehite, Mulekite/Jaredite and whatever else crossed over the Behring Strait. As a people of mixed heritage, Captain Moroni's interaction with his warriors, is also an example of the innate subjectivity of ethnic identity, and why we should be careful of making blanket statements of what constituted a Nephite or Lamanite.

For example, when an American proudly says that his "family came here with the Pilgrims" or "I'm Irish" that doesn't mean that he doesn't have ancestors who were Native American, Scandinavian, Dutch, Italian, German or Jewish. People of mixed ancestry usually trumpet the heritage that means the most to them or that will give them the most social capital. 


Another example of this is my own heritage. I was born in Puerto Rico(USA) to Puerto Rican parents. According to my Ancestry DNA results, I'm 10% African(6% North and 4%Sub-Saharan), 12% Native American(probably Taino), 4% West Asian(Arab?) and 74% European(36% Iberian, 16% Italy/Greece, 6% Scandinavian and 6% European Jewish).

If I converted to Judaism, I might emphasize my distant Jewish roots and say that I am actually reverting to Judaism. If I joined Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, I might emphasize my African heritage. If I was into La Raza(brown power ideology) I might say I'm native american. If I had vaguely racist tendencies, I might just tell people "I was born in Puerto Rico but my ancestors are from Spain". 

In any of these cases, I would not be lying, yet I would also be ommiting truthful information for my own ideological purposes. The Nephites were no different. Which is why a lack of explicit references to "others" or Jaredite survivors in the Book of Mormon is irrelevant to the the fact they were in the mix. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book of Mormon Geography: An Important Note on John L. Sorenson's Paradigm

Anyone who has read An Ancient American Setting for The Book of Mormon, Mormon's Codex or Images of Ancient America: Visualizing Book of Mormon Life, or anything else by John L. Sorenson, will notice that he leans on the work of the New World Archaeological Foundation(NWAF). This is because he places the Nephite heartland in the central depression of Chiapas, with the River Sidon being the Grijalva River. 
For me, the convergances in cultural development and in the movements of people, between the Book of Mormon and this region of Mesoamerica, in time and space, stretching from Veracruz, Oaxaca, Chiapas to Highland Guatemala, are impressive. 
As I'v said before, Sorenson's paradigm owes much to the NWAF, a legitimate and respected archeological franchise. Speaking of the his experience with the NWAF, non-mormon archeologist, Michael Coe says:

When I was a graduate student writing my dissertation on very early cultures in the south coast of Guatemala, it was suggested to me…

Failed 19th Century Attempts at Describing Nephi's Arabian Journey

Modern critics of the Book of Mormon seem to agree that Nephi's inland route of travel, through Arabia, is basically correct, in light of what we know today. 
After fleeing Jerusalem and then leaving their initial base camp, Lehi's family travels in a south-southeast direction, following the coast of the Red Sea. One of the elders of the group dies and is buried in "the place which was called Nahom". Up until this point, the group had named their various stopping points, but the record uses the passive tense here to show that it already had a name. After their stay in Nahom, Lehi's group then travels "nearly eastward", paralleling the frankincense trail, traveling "through affilction", until the reach a lush and verdant coast they name Bountiful. The above correlation with ancient Arabia is strong, as one critic acknowledged:
Among critical historians who accept that the BoM arose as a modern production of Joseph Smith, two main theories have b…

The Prophecy of Aminadi: What, When and Where.

Aminadi was a prophet of God. At around 82 BC, his descendant, Amulek, tells us that he was the son Giddonah, who was the son of Ishmael, who was a descendant of Aminadi, the same Aminadi who interpreted the writing on the temple wall, which was written by the finger of the Lord.

What Amulek and, by extension, Mormon do not tell us is what was written on the wall, nor when or where it was written. Presumably, this was insider information, something Amulek's audience was already aware of. 
The mere mention of Aminadi and his interpretation, without giving more information, shows that the incident was a sufficiently important historical event, whose details did not need rehearsing. However, the setting, time and message of the divine temple inscription might be recovered with the use of archeology. The following is something from the great Michael Coe:
Archeologist Marion Hatch and her Guatemalan colleagues have encountered evidence for the existance of a now-extinct lake around whic…