Skip to main content

Was the Brother of Jared Sumerian?

In the Book of Ether we hear that Jared and his brother feared the confounding of their language and the brother of Jared prayed that the language of his brother and their friends would not be confounded(Ether 1:33-35).

In 1828, the word confound meant to "to mingle and blend different things, so that their forms or natures cannot be distinguished; to mix in a mass or crowd, so that individuals cannot be distinguished."

What's more, in Ether and unlike Genesis, Jared's family and friends see this mixing coming a mile away. So we have "a great tower", "scattering" and language mixing.

None of this is remarkable in and of itself since Moroni is making the connection between the early Jaredites and the language myth of Genesis.

Now, we know that the world's languages, from Chinese to Tongan to Spanish to Arawak don't come from Mesopotamia, because of some linguistic Cambrian explosion 5,000(?) years ago. So how do we make sense of the tower, scattering and language mixing found in Ether 1?

In one of my past posts, The End of the Jaredites, I made a case for having the Jaredites arrive in the New World at around 2350 BC. So imagine my pleasant surprise when I just realized that Sumer was conquered by the Akkadians, a Semetic speaking people led by Sargon of Akkad, in 2334 BC. Also, as early as 2500 BC, many Akkadian loan words had already crept into the Sumerian language.

Maybe, just maybe, Jared and his people were fleeing Sargon of Akkad, or at least Akkadian influences on what they perceived to be pure Sumerian culture, what they perceived to be the pollution of their language. Certainly, according to my scheme, they left during Sumer's decline. Could this be the historical core beneath Moroni's telling of Jaredite ethnogenesis? Maybe. 


Popular posts from this blog

Book of Mormon Geography: An Important Note on John L. Sorenson's Paradigm

Anyone who has read An Ancient American Setting for The Book of Mormon, Mormon's Codex or Images of Ancient America: Visualizing Book of Mormon Life, or anything else by John L. Sorenson, will notice that he leans on the work of the New World Archaeological Foundation(NWAF). This is because he places the Nephite heartland in the central depression of Chiapas, with the River Sidon being the Grijalva River. 
For me, the convergances in cultural development and in the movements of people, between the Book of Mormon and this region of Mesoamerica, in time and space, stretching from Veracruz, Oaxaca, Chiapas to Highland Guatemala, are impressive. 
As I'v said before, Sorenson's paradigm owes much to the NWAF, a legitimate and respected archeological franchise. Speaking of the his experience with the NWAF, non-mormon archeologist, Michael Coe says:

When I was a graduate student writing my dissertation on very early cultures in the south coast of Guatemala, it was suggested to me…

The Mexican Book of Mormon

Disclaimer: The following post is not political in nature. It is a not a "brown power" or "la raza" manifesto; nor is it intended to be an endorsement or condemnation of illegal immigration into the US. This post is speculative in nature and does not represent the official position of any church. This post is also not an attempt to prove that Joseph Smith Jr was a true prophet of God. We can't prove the Book of Mormon true but we can prove it interesting. 

Who cares about the geography of the Book of Mormon? Does it have a salvific or applicable value? No, from an eternal perspective, Book of Mormon geography is completely irrelevant. The Book of Mormon exists to bring people to Christ, so that they might repent of their sins and follow Him into the waters of baptism. That's it. Nevertheless, some people really like the Book of Mormon and want to know more about it and the people who wrote it. That's where geography comes in.

Just as knowing about the R…

The Prophecy of Aminadi: What, When and Where.

Aminadi was a prophet of God. At around 82 BC, his descendant, Amulek, tells us that he was the son Giddonah, who was the son of Ishmael, who was a descendant of Aminadi, the same Aminadi who interpreted the writing on the temple wall, which was written by the finger of the Lord.

What Amulek and, by extension, Mormon do not tell us is what was written on the wall, nor when or where it was written. Presumably, this was insider information, something Amulek's audience was already aware of. 
The mere mention of Aminadi and his interpretation, without giving more information, shows that the incident was a sufficiently important historical event, whose details did not need rehearsing. However, the setting, time and message of the divine temple inscription might be recovered with the use of archeology. The following is something from the great Michael Coe:
Archeologist Marion Hatch and her Guatemalan colleagues have encountered evidence for the existance of a now-extinct lake around whic…